For the state police, FBI and Interpol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the state police, FBI and Interpol |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Saturday January 19, 2019 08:46AM
This website is posted in the hope that it will lead to the recovery of a victim of traffickers in women and children.
All police services and private individuals with any knowledge of Oliver Albert Chanyut
Chokjanphen (AKA Chanyut Vermeulen, Channy Vermeulen, DJ Channy and DJ Chavvy), age 25, born in Thailand on February 28, 1989,
and last reported to be in Belgium, are urged to contact this website and/or his family at once as indicated: Tel.:
66 - 08 4 726 4836; 66 - 08 - 6024 - 7032. Or jamesonrosemont@yahoo.com
It is believed that the victim is surrounded by bad company and unaware of the Internet posting. Thai government TV broadcasts three appeals
in search for Oliver Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen
 Watch the last broadcast on You Tube:
Contact Thai PBS-TV! For details see:
James Champa's website has been blocked by Lycos Tripod since mid-October 2013. Tripod has refused to explain or justify the blockage.
Two
website accounts were blocked by Lycos Tripod without explanation in mid-January 2011: Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com
The websites to this account were blocked by Lycos Tripod from mid-January to February 25 and the controlling website account was blocked until March 10, 2011.
Searching
for Chanyut Chokjanphen www.chanyut_1.tripod.com/
This account was blocked from mid-January 2011 to March 1, 2011.
By
blocking the accounts Lycos Tripod blocked about 30 other related websites. Because
Lycos Tripod employees would not reply to a request to unblock the websites, the following letter was sent to the chief executive
officer (CEO) of Ybrant Digital, Ltd., the parent company of Lycos Tripod, by email on January 24, 2011. URGENT Suresh
Reddy CEO
Ybrant
Digital Ltd. January
24, 2011 Dear
Mr. Reddy: I
hope that you will restore an important service at Lycos Tripod that was recently removed. I
write to you on behalf of a family in Oliver
Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen is the victim of an international pedophile and prostitution ring. He was reported murdered in
It
has been impossible to obtain details because Belgian officials are obstructing efforts to trace him and expose his kidnappers
and traffickers. The
family has relied upon Lycos Tripod since 2004 to post websites about the missing loved one. Law enforcement agencies worldwide
refer to the website. About
one week ago, a Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen’s Website (thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked. This
was the first time that the website was blocked. Because blockage of the website could only hamper search efforts, the blockage
appeared to have been an error. However,
shortly after the website was blocked dozens of active Lycos Tripod websites about the same victim, created since 2004, were
also blocked. The
blockage of many related sites appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search for a trafficking victim
and to expose a pedophile ring. An
emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse intentions could be running amok at Lycos Tripod and blocking these and similar
websites. Someone
at Lycos Tripod could be in conspiracy with the victim's kidnappers and killers to block the websites. The
safety of the victim, if still alive, the victim's friends and relatives, and witnesses and persons conducting the search
could be at risk. The
person or persons at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites must be identified and stopped. Kindly
ensure that Lycos Tripod unblocks the websites. I
have attached a copy of the website and the request to Lycos Tripod to unblock the website(s) for your reference. You
may reply to the following email account: ----------------------------------------------------. On
behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I
am, Sincerely
yours, Jameson
Rosemont At
the time there were reports of Oliver Chanyut’s death from Thais in Attention Lycos Tripod employees! Do not block this site! It is posted here for the consideration of
law enforcement authorities in the matter of the unexplained blockage of a Lycos Tripod website account.
In at least four earlier incidents
of hacking, twice in 2010 and twice in 2011, Lycos Tripod employees blocked website accounts that exposed international
pedophile and prostitution rings trafficking in women and children. The websites were posted to assist in the search of the
missing victim. In two 2010 incidents, Lycos Tripod employees eventually revealed that they
blocked website accounts at the request of one or more accomplices of the pedophile and prostitution rings trafficking in
women and children. In the latter two incidents, which occurred at almost the same time in January 2011, the employees offered
numerous excuses before insisting an error had been made. The motive for the blockage of this particular website of James Champa - and other James Champa
websites about the same trafficking case -
by Lycos Tripod employees may have been to conceal evidence of their complicity with members of the pedophile and prostitution
ring trafficking in women and children or accomplices of the ring. As in the four earlier incidents, Lycos Tripod employees might have blocked
the following contents at the request of someone outside the company, most likely one of the traffickers or a complicit
official of a public or private agency. The following contents might provide a clue to the identity of the person
or persons at Lycos Tripod and/or outside the company responsible for the blockage of this and other websites that concern
the case of Oliver Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen since 2011. Hackers claiming to work for Lycos Tripod hacked Wikipedia pages that mentioned
the blockage of websites by Lycos Tripod employees that exposed pedophile rings and described the victims. Note that the names of Lycos Tripod employees who hacked Wikipedia pages
were blacked out on the website before it was blocked in October 2013. The names have not been blacked out here. ----------------
The following is a copy of the original website, which has been
blocked since mid-October 2013.
On the original website, following the letter to Suresh Reddy,
correspondence with Lycos Tripod employees was posted and updated until the account was unblocked. Note that the two websites, www.chanyut_1.tripod.com/ and www.members.tripod.com/chanyut_1 , are actually the same website account.
The correspondence was updated with additional messages until the account was unblocked
in mid-March 2011.
websites, account blocked
Subject websites, account blocked
Category Report Abuse > Tripod Abuse (RA)
Email thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
Login Name ------------------------ This Question's Message(s)
1 Message by you on Sat, 22nd Jan 2011 6:04 am January
22, 2011
About one week ago the Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen Website
(thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked.
This would appear to have been an error.
The website was created in 2004 to help law enforcement agencies search
for a kidnapping and trafficking victim. Police services worldwide refer to the website.
The missing person who is the object of this particular search is Chanyut
Chokjanphen. He was reported murdered in Belgium two or three years ago.
It is inconceivable that Lycos would block the website since its removal
can only hamper the search for the victim and his kidnappers and killers.
Thus, it could be assumed that the blocking of the site was in error.
However, following the blocking of this website, many other Lycos Tripod
websites concerning the same missing person, created since 2004 and still active, were also blocked.
This was the first time any of the websites concerning the victim was blocked.
Thus, the blocking of so many related sites, all of which were created
to help search for the same missing person, appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search. It is essential and urgent that the person or persons behiind the blocking of these websites
be identified.
There could be someone, an emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse
personal motives, at Lycos Tripod who is running amok and blocking these and similar websites. Otherwise,
there is someone at Lycos Triropd who is in conspiracy with the victim's kidnappers and killers.
The saftey of the victim, if still alive, and the victim's friends and relatives,
and witnesses and persons involved in the search, could be at risk.
It is important to identify the person at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites.
It is important also to know if that person at Lycos Tripod operated alone
or together with another person outside Lycos Tripod.
If the sites were blocked by someone at Lycos Tripod for another person
who is outside the company, it is imperative that both persons be identified at once.
Above all, the person who initiated the blocking of the websites, whether
he or she be at Lycos Tripod or outside the company, must be identified without delay.
Kindly state why the sites were blocked? Was there a reason or excuse given?
By whom were the websites blocked?
A swift and proper reply will be most helpful.
Please unblock the website.
Reply to the following email account: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
2 Message by you on Tue, 25th Jan 2011 4:36 pm January
22, 2011
About one week ago the Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen Website
(thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked.
This would appear to have been an error.
The website was created in 2004 to help law enforcement agencies search
for a kidnapping and trafficking victim. Police services worldwide
refer to the website. The missing person who is the object of this particular search is Chanyut
Chokjanphen. He was reported murdered in Belgium two or three years ago.
It is inconceivable that Lycos would block the website since its removal
can only hamper the search for the victim and his kidnappers and killers. Thus, it could be assumed that the blocking of the
site was in error.
However, following the blocking of this website, many other Lycos Tripod
websites concerning the same missing person, created since 2004 and still active, were also blocked.
This was the first time any of the websites concerning the victim
was blocked. Thus, the blocking of so many related sites, all of which were created
to help search for the same missing person, appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search.
It is essential and urgent that the person or persons behiind the blocking
of these websites be identified.
There could be someone, an emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse personal
motives, at Lycos Tripod who is running amok and blocking these and similar websites.
Otherwise, there is someone at Lycos Triropd who is in conspiracy with the
victim's kidnappers and killers.
The saftey of the victim, if still alive, and the victim's friends and relatives,
and witnesses and persons involved in the search, could be at risk.
It is important to identify the person at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites.
It is important also to know if that person at Lycos Tripod operated alone
or together with another person outside Lycos Tripod.
If the sites were blocked by someone at Lycos Tripod for another person
who is outside the company, it is imperative that both persons be identified at once.
Above all, the person who initiated the blocking of the websites, whether
he or she be at Lycos Tripod or outside the company, must be identified without delay.
Kindly state why the sites were blocked? Was there a reason or excuse given?
By whom were the websites blocked?
A swift and proper reply will be most helpful.
Please unblock the website.
Reply to the following email account: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
3 Message by you on Thu, 27th Jan 2011 2:36 pm
From: Thanomjit Chokjanphen <thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: websites, account blocked - [6437-EDJL-6499] [74d8105e] To: "Lycos Support" <support@support.lycos.com> Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 12:25 PM January 22, 2011
About one week ago the Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen Website
(thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked.
This would appear to have been an error.
The website was created in 2004 to help law enforcement agencies search
for a kidnapping and trafficking victim. Police services worldwide
refer to the website. The missing person who is the object of this particular search is Chanyut
Chokjanphen. He was reported murdered in Belgium two or three years ago.
It is inconceivable that Lycos would block the website since its removal
can only hamper the search for the victim and his kidnappers and killers. Thus, it could be assumed that the blocking of the
site was in error.
However, following the blocking of this website, many other Lycos
Tripod websites concerning the same missing person, created since 2004 and still
active, were also blocked.
This was the first time any of the websites concerning the victim was blocked.
Thus, the blocking of so many related sites, all of which were created to
help search for the same missing person, appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search.
It is essential and urgent that the person or persons behiind the blocking
of these websites be identified.
There could be someone, an emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse personal
motives, at Lycos Tripod who is running amok and blocking these and similar websites.
Otherwise, there is someone at Lycos Triropd who is in conspiracy with the
victim's kidnappers and killers.
The saftey of the victim, if still alive, and the victim's friends and relatives,
and witnesses and persons involved in the search, could be at risk.
It is important to identify the person at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites.
It is important also to know if that person at Lycos Tripod operated alone
or together with another person outside Lycos Tripod.
If the sites were blocked by someone at Lycos Tripod for another person
who is outside the company, it is imperative that both persons be identified at once.
Above all, the person who initiated the blocking of the websites, whether
he or she be at Lycos Tripod or outside the company, must be identified without delay.
Kindly state why the sites were blocked? Was there a reason or excuse given?
By whom were the websites blocked?
A swift and proper reply will be most helpful.
Please unblock the website.
Reply to the following email account: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
4 Message by you on Mon, 31st Jan 2011 7:26 am From: Thanomjit Chokjanphen <thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: websites, account blocked - [6437-EDJL-6499] [74d8105e] To: "Lycos Support" <support@support.lycos.com> Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 12:25 PM January 22, 2011
About one week ago the Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen Website
(thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked.
This would appear to have been an error.
The website was created in 2004 to help law enforcement agencies search
for a kidnapping and trafficking victim. Police services worldwide refer to the website.
The missing person who is the object of this particular search is Chanyut
Chokjanphen. He was reported murdered in Belgium two or three years ago.
It is inconceivable that Lycos would block the website since its removal
can only hamper the search for the victim and his kidnappers and killers. Thus, it could be assumed that the blocking of the
site was in error.
However, following the blocking of this website, many other Lycos Tripod
websites concerning the same missing person, created since 2004 and still active, were also blocked.
This was the first time any of the websites concerning the victim was blocked.
Thus, the blocking of so many related sites, all of which were created to
help search for the same missing person, appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search.
It is essential and urgent that the person or persons behiind the blocking
of these websites be identified.
There could be someone, an emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse personal
motives, at Lycos Tripod who is running amok and blocking these and similar websites.
Otherwise, there is someone at Lycos Triropd who is in conspiracy with the
victim's kidnappers and killers.
The saftey of the victim, if still alive, and the victim's friends and relatives,
and witnesses and persons involved in the search, could be at risk.
It is important to identify the person at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites.
It is important also to know if that person at Lycos Tripod operated alone
or together with another person outside Lycos Tripod.
If the sites were blocked by someone at Lycos Tripod for another person
who is outside the company, it is imperative that both persons be identified at once.
Above all, the person who initiated the blocking of the websites, whether
he or she be at Lycos Tripod or outside the company, must be identified without delay.
Kindly state why the sites were blocked? Was there a reason or excuse given?
By whom were the websites blocked?
A swift and proper reply will be most helpful.
Please unblock the website.
Reply to the following email account: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
5 Message by you on Thu, 3rd Feb 2011 11:26 am
January 22, 2011
About one week ago the Lycos Tripod website, Thanomjit Chokjanphen Website
(thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com), was blocked.
This would appear to have been an error.
The website was created in 2004 to help law enforcement agencies search
for a kidnapping and trafficking victim. Police services worldwide refer to the website.
The missing person who is the object of this particular search is Chanyut
Chokjanphen. He was reported murdered in Belgium two or three years ago.
It is inconceivable that Lycos would block the website since its removal
can only hamper the search for the victim and his kidnappers and killers. Thus, it could be assumed that the blocking of the
site was in error.
However, following the blocking of this website, many other Lycos Tripod
websites concerning the same missing person, created since 2004 and still active, were also blocked.
This was the first time any of the websites concerning the victim was blocked.
Thus, the blocking of so many related sites, all of which were created to
help search for the same missing person, appears to be a deliberate and malicious attempt to thwart the search.
It is essential and urgent that the person or persons behiind the blocking
of these websites be identified.
There could be someone, an emotionally disturbed hacker with perverse personal
motives, at Lycos Tripod who is running amok and blocking these and similar websites.
Otherwise, there is someone at Lycos Triropd who is in conspiracy with the
victim's kidnappers and killers.
The saftey of the victim, if still alive, and the victim's friends and relatives,
and witnesses and persons involved in the search, could be at risk.
It is important to identify the person at Lycos Tripod who blocked the websites.
It is important also to know if that person at Lycos Tripod operated alone
or together with another person outside Lycos Tripod.
If the sites were blocked by someone at Lycos Tripod for another person
who is outside the company, it is imperative that both persons be identified at once.
Above all, the person who initiated the blocking of the websites, whether
he or she be at Lycos Tripod or outside the company, must be identified without delay.
Kindly state why the sites were blocked? Was there a reason or excuse given?
By whom were the websites blocked?
A swift and proper reply will be most helpful.
Please unblock the website.
Reply to the following email account: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com
6
Message by our staff on Tue, 8th Feb 2011 12:52 pm
Hello Thanomjit Chokjanphen,
Thank you for your patience.
A staff member has replied
to your question:
We understand your situation
and we would like to reinstate your site.
However, posting anyones
full name, email, and/ or address is not permitted with our services.
As long as you are willing
to comply to this please let us know and once you have made the changes we can review your site accordingly and take the proper
steps to ensure you have followed our Terms of Services.
Please contact us if
you need any further assistance with your membership.
Stephan
Lycos Customer Service 7 Message by you on Sun, 13th Feb 2011 4:46 pm
To Lycos Support:
Lycos Tripod blocked the following website account in mid-January 2011: Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website http://www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com The account controls some 30 to 40 websites that concern a missing person, the victim of a pedophile and prostitution ring kidnapping and trafficking women and children. The websites were posted to assist law enforcement services in the search. In your reply, on February 8, 2011 you stated that the website account was blocked because full name and addresses appear on the various websites controlled by the account: ". . . posting anyones full name, email, and/or address is not permitted
with our services."
However, countless Lycos Tripod websites include people's full names and addresses. You must be more specific. Who objects to being identified by name on the websites concerned? Kindly reply with more precise details as soon as possible. On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am, Jameson Rosemont Webmaster 8 Message by you on Thu, 17th Feb 2011 4:06 amTo Lycos Support:
Lycos Tripod blocked the following website account in mid-January 2011: Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website http://www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com The account controls some 30 to 40 websites that concern a missing person, the victim of a pedophile and prostitution ring kidnapping and trafficking women and children. The websites were posted to assist law enforcement services in the search. In your reply, on February 8, 2011 you stated that the website account was blocked because because full name and addresses appear on the various websites controlled by the account: ". . . posting anyones full name, email, and/or address is not permitted
with our services."
However, countless Lycos Tripod websites include people's full names and addresses. You must be more specific. Who objects to being identified by name on the websites concerned? Kindly reply with more precise details as soon as possible. On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am, Jameson Rosemont Webmaster 9 Message by you on Fri, 18th Feb 2011 4:06 am
To Lycos Support:
Lycos Tripod blocked the following website account in mid-January 2011: Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website http://www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com The account controls some 30 to 40 websites that concern a missing person, the victim of a pedophile and prostitution ring
kidnapping and trafficking women and children. The websites were posted to assist law enforcement services in the search.
In your reply, on February 8, 2011 you stated that the website account was blocked because because full name and addresses appear on the various websites controlled by the account: ". . . posting anyones full name, email, and/or address is not permitted
with our services."
However, countless Lycos Tripod websites include people's full names and addresses. Who objects to being identified by name on the websites concerned? Kindly reply with more precise details as soon as possible. On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am, Jameson Rosemont Webmaster 10 Message by you on Sun, 20th Feb 2011 12:16 pm
February 21, 2011
You have yet to reply to an inquiry on February 13. Please do so immediately. You claim to have blocked the website account of Thanomjit Chokjanphen because its websites listed full names and addresses. According to legal counsel, this is not an appropriate excuse for blocking the account. Kindly explain your remark. For whom did you block the account? From: Thanomjit Chokjanphen <thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: websites, account blocked - [6437-EDJL-6499] [74d8105e] To: "Lycos Support" <support@support.lycos.com>
Date: Sunday, February 13, 2011, 12:30 PM To Lycos Support:
Lycos Tripod blocked the following website account in mid-January 2011: Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website http://www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com The account controls some 30 to 40 websites that concern a missing person, the victim of a pedophile and prostitution ring kidnapping and trafficking women and children. The websites were posted to assist law enforcement services in the search. In your reply, on February 8, 2011 you stated that the website account was blocked because full names and addresses appear on the various websites controlled by the account: ". . . posting anyones full name, email, and/or address is not permitted with our services." However, countless Lycos Tripod websites include people's full names and addresses. You must be more specific. Who objects to being identified by name on the websites concerned? Kindly reply with more precise details as soon as possible. On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am, Jameson Rosemont Webmaster 11 Message by you on Mon, 21st Feb 2011 10:06 am
You have yet to reply to an inquiry on February 13.
Please do so immediately.
You claim to have blocked the website account of Thanomjit Chokjanphen because its websites listed full names and addresses. According to legal counsel, this is not an appropriate excuse for blocking the account. Kindly explain your remark. For whom did you block the account? Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 8:16 AM
12 Message by you
on Thu, 24th Feb 2011 3:06 pm
-----------------
May 13, 2011
No explanation given for website account blockage
FROM Thanomjit Chokjanphen FromThanomjit Chokjanphen
Lycos Tripod blocking websites without explanation
Lycos Tripod blocking websites without explanation
Thailand
May 3, 2011
Dear
Sir/Madam:
There has been no reply from you to requests to identify the person and motive behind the recent blocage of three website accounts. Earlier
this year, Lycos Tipod blocked three website accounts that manage some 40 websites posted since 2004 to help law enforcement
officials world-wide in the search for a kidnapping and trafficking victim who was probably murdered two or three years ago.
The accounts were unblocked eventually, after many requests, but Lycos
Tripod failed to explain the blockage.
It is clear that a hacker at Lycos Tripod blocked the three website
accounts in an expression of perverse anti-social mailice or, more likely, in conspiracy with a network of kidnappers
and traffickers in women and children.
We have repeatedly asked Lycos Tripod to identify the person or persons behind
the blockage.
If someone outside the company asked Lycos Tripod to block the wesbites,
that person can probably lead law enforcement officials to the kidnappers and murderers of the victim.
Without
further dealy, kindly identify the person or persons who asked Lycos Tripod to block the website accounts. Who was it? What
was the reason given?
If it
was a company employee please identify that person and explain his/her conduct.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family,
I am,
Sincerely
yours,
Jameson
Rosemont
-------------
No explanation given for website account blockage
Lycos Tripod blocking websites without explanation
Thailand
May 3, 2011
Dear Sir/Madam:
There has been no reply from you to requests to identify the person and motive behind the recent blocage of three website accounts. Earlier this year, Lycos Tipod blocked three website accounts that manage
some 40 websites posted since 2004 to help law enforcement officials world-wide in the search for a kidnapping and trafficking
victim who was probably murdered two or three years ago.
The accounts were unblocked eventually, after many requests, but Lycos
Tripod failed to explain the blockage.
It is clear that a hacker at Lycos Tripod blocked the three website
accounts in an expression of perverse anti-social mailice or, more likely, in conspiracy with a network of kidnappers
and traffickers in women and children.
We have repeatedly asked Lycos Tripod to identify the person or persons behind
the blockage.
If someone outside the company asked Lycos Tripod to block the wesbites,
that person can probably lead law enforcement officials to the kidnappers and murderers of the victim.
Without further dealy, kindly identify the person or persons who asked Lycos
Tripod to block the website accounts. Who was it? What was the reason given?
If it was a company employee please identify that person and explain
his/her conduct.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family,
I am,
Sincerely yours,
Jameson Rosemont
-----------------
No explanation given for website account blockageTo: public.relations@lycos-inc.com
From: thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com To: public.relations@lycos-inc.com CC: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com; jamesonrosemont@yahoo.com Subject: No explanation given for website account blockage Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:49:48 +0000 Lycos Tripod blocking websites without explanation
Thailand
May 3, 2011
Dear Sir/Madam:
There has been no reply from you to requests to identify the person and motive behind the recent blocage of three website accounts. Earlier this year, Lycos Tipod blocked three website accounts that manage
some 40 websites posted since 2004 to help law enforcement officials world-wide in the search for a kidnapping and trafficking
victim who was probably murdered two or three years ago.
The accounts were unblocked eventually, after many requests, but Lycos
Tripod failed to explain the blockage.
It is clear that a hacker at Lycos Tripod blocked the three website
accounts in an expression of perverse anti-social mailice or, more likely, in conspiracy with a network of kidnappers
and traffickers in women and children.
We have repeatedly asked Lycos Tripod to identify the person or persons behind
the blockage.
If someone outside the company asked Lycos Tripod to block the wesbites,
that person can probably lead law enforcement officials to the kidnappers and murderers of the victim.
Without further dealy, kindly identify the person or persons who asked Lycos
Tripod to block the website accounts. Who was it? What was the reason given?
If it was a company employee please identify that person and explain
his/her conduct.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family,
I am,
Sincerely yours,
Jameson Rosemont
----------------------
FW: No explanation given for website account blockage
From: thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com To: public.relations@lycos-inc.com Subject: No explanation given for website account blockage Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 10:59:17 +0000 From: thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com To: public.relations@lycos-inc.com CC: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com; jamesonrosemont@yahoo.com Subject: No explanation given for website account blockage Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:49:48 +0000 Lycos Tripod blocking websites without explanation
Thailand
May 3, 2011
Dear Sir/Madam:
There has been no reply from you to requests to identify the person and motive behind the recent blocage of three website accounts. Earlier this year, Lycos Tipod blocked three website accounts that manage
some 40 websites posted since 2004 to help law enforcement officials world-wide in the search for a kidnapping and trafficking
victim who was probably murdered two or three years ago.
The accounts were unblocked eventually, after many requests, but Lycos
Tripod failed to explain the blockage.
It is clear that a hacker at Lycos Tripod blocked the three website
accounts in an expression of perverse anti-social mailice or, more likely, in conspiracy with a network of kidnappers
and traffickers in women and children.
We have repeatedly asked Lycos Tripod to identify the person or persons behind
the blockage.
If someone outside the company asked Lycos Tripod to block the wesbites,
that person can probably lead law enforcement officials to the kidnappers and murderers of the victim.
Without further dealy, kindly identify the person or persons who asked Lycos
Tripod to block the website accounts. Who was it? What was the reason given?
If it was a company employee please identify that person and explain
his/her conduct.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family,
I am,
Sincerely yours,
Jameson Rosemont
--------------- Site RemovalTo: thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com
Good Morning,
My name is Steve and I represent the Abuse section of Lycos.
We received your email in regards to you account being blocked.
We have checked the sites that you emailed us and those sites are not blocked
and are open for people to see.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your patience.
-- Steve | Product Support Representative Lycos Inc. | 100 Fifth Avenue, Waltham, MA 02451
--------------
RE: Site RemovalTo: steve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com
Thailand
Friday, June 10, 2011 Dear Sir: Thank you for your reply. You seem to have misunderstood the inquiry, however. The sites were unblocked. That is so, but that is not the point here. The question is: Who blocked the websites? The websites were posted in 2004 to assist in the search for a kidnapping and trafficking victim from Thailand who was reported to have been murdered in Belgium. The websites were delibartately blocked by someone at Lycos for the first time, earlier this year - either a malicious pervert operating alone, in which case he probably blocked many other similar Lycos websites, or someone at Lycos who entered in conspiracy with traffickers in women and children to block the sites. The person who blocked the sites should explain why he did so. If he did so on his own, he had better have a reasonable excuse. If he blocked them at somebody's request, he should identify the person or persons who asked him to block the websites and explain their reasons. It is certain that the identity of the persons responsible for the blockage earlier this year can lead the police to the victim's kidnappers and traffickers and, if recent reports are true, killers. The Thai government has just launched a public campaign to find the victim. Lycos should behave responsibly in this matter. Kindly reply directly and to the point, without prevarication. I am, on behalf of the Chokjanphen family, Sincerey yours, Jameson Rosemont --------------------
Re: Site Removal
Steve Osemwenkhae 6/10/2011
To: Thanomjit Chokjanphen Good Morning
The sites were blocked due to a misunderstanding in procedures and a few glitches in our system also took some sites
offline. Unfortunately we cannot list out individuals names but I will take responsibility for the matter. We can assure you
their was no intent of blocking deliberately. We apologize greatly again for any inconvenience.
---------------
RE: Site Removal
Thanomjit Chokjanphen 6/16/2011
To: steve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com Thailand June 17, 2011
Mr. Osemwenkhae,
This matter must be pursued because the identity of the person or persons who blocked the three website accounts last January could lead police to the victim, dead or alive.
The blockage of the three website accounts was not a coincidence. It was not caused by technical malfunctions as you claim.
There is sufficient evidence that the blockage was deliberate and carried out in a criminal conspiracy with the victim’s traffickers.
The first excuse offered by Lycos, by an employee identified only as “Stephan”, on February 8, 2011, was that the websites were blocked because they mentioned people by name and address. That was not allowed by Lycos, the employee claimed.
This was utter nonsense, of course.
It was obvious that persons in the criminal networks identified by the websites did not like being exposed and got someone at Lycos to block the websites.
When one considers the conduct of Lycos since July 2010, there can be no question about the motives behind the blockage.
In July of last year, Lycos blocked Lawrence Blackstone’s website, Diplomats in Pedophile Scandal, a site that does not mention the trafficking victim by name but makes several references to him.
According to Lycos, the site was blocked at the request of Ralph Boyce, Christopher Richard, Thomas P. Furey and/or Paul O. Mayer. While assigned to the American embassy in Bangkok, these State Department officials conspired with a prostitution and pedophile ring to commit fraud, traffic in women and children, endanger witnesses, cover up their crimes, etc. The site, posted in 2004, had never been blocked before.
In December 2010 another Lycos website that makes reference to the trafficking victim, John Thomas Again, was blocked, according to Lycos, at the request of Jane Puranananda, an American employed by a Thai law firm in bangkok.
Ms. Puranananda conspired with her employer, a Thai lawyer, Dej-Udom Krairat, formerly vice-president of the Law Society of Thailand (now president of its successor office) and head of his Bangkok law firm, Dej-Udom & Associates; a translator in the law firm' and numerous court officials to obstruct the legal process and intimidate witnesses in this case.
Other relevant Lycos websites, created many years ago, were blocked in the past several months.
It appears that one or more of the above mentioned persons also got a Lycos employee to block three more website accounts - those of concern here - last January.
Lycos has cooperated before. Do so again. Do not try to cover up. Kindly identify the person or persons who asked you - or whoever it was at Lycos - to block the websites last January.
Otherwise, the police must question you.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am,
Jameson Rosemont
-----------------
Blocked WebsiteTo: thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com
Cc: Steve Osemwenkhae
Jameson ...
----------------
RE: Blocked Website Thanomjit Chokjanphen 7/1/2011 To: public.relations@lycos-inc.com
Thailand July 1, 2011
To the P. R. office, Lycos Tripod
Sir,
A kidnapping and trafficking victim has not been found and is feared dead.
Lycos Tripod employees should cooperate and identify the person or persons who requested the blockage of three relevant website accounts in January so that police may question them to try to determine the fate the victim.
The website accounts concerned are:
Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website (www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/),
Searching for Chanyut Chokjanphen (www.chanyut_1.tripod.com/) and
Chanyut Chokjanphen (www.members.tripod.com/chanyut_1/)
The three website accounts control more than 50 websites posted since 2004 on Lycos to assist law enforcement services world-wide in the search for the victim.
The three website accounts had not been blocked before.
Initially, Lycos offered conflicting excuses for the blockage:
6 Message by our staff on Tue, 8th Feb 2011 12:52 pm
Hello Thanomjit Chokjanphen,
Thank you for your patience.
A staff member has replied to your question:
We understand your situation and we would like to reinstate your site.
However, posting anyones full name, email, and/ or address is not permitted with our services. As long as you are willing to comply to this please let us know and once you have made the changes we can review your site accordingly and take the proper steps to ensure you have followed our Terms of Services.
Please contact us if you need any further assistance with your membership.
Stephan Lycos Customer Service
The remark by the same employee, made when restoring the sites, follows:
13 Message by our staff on Fri, 25th Feb 2011 4:27 pm
Thank you for your patience.
Your site has been reinstated because of Free Speech.
However, if we recieve a subpoena, search warrant, or parallel legal documentation we will have no choice but to shut it down.
You are well in your rights to have the site up and we apologize for any inconvenience.
Please contact us if you need any further assistance.
Stephan Lycos Customer Service
The excuse offered by Steve Osemwenkhae, on June 10, conflicts with the earlier excuses:
6/10/2011 Reply
Steve Osemwenkhae Steve Osemwenkhaesteve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com
To Thanomjit Chokjanphen From: Steve Osemwenkhae (steve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com) Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:59:20 PM To: Thanomjit Chokjanphen (thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com)
Good Morning
The sites were blocked due to a misunderstanding in procedures and a few glitches in our system also took some sites offline. Unfortunately we cannot list out individuals names but I will take responsibility for the matter. We can assure you their was no intent of blocking deliberately. We apologize greatly again for any inconvenience.
The excuses offered by Lycos employees concerning the blockage of the websites, on February 8 and June 10, contradicted one another.
Note also that Mr. Osemwenkhae's comment reads like double-talk: one, he claims the blockage was caused by "a few glitches" and, two, he adds that "we cannot list out individuals names".
The intentions behind these excuses seemed to be to cover up the identity of the person or persons, inside or outside the company, responsible for the blockage of the accounts.
Consider two other Lycos website accounts, belonging to Lawrence Blackstone, Diplomats in Pedophile Scandal, and John Thomas, Organized Crime, the Justice System and the Privy Council of Thailand, which control websites that refer to the victim of concern here without mentioning him by name. The former account was blocked by Lycos in July of last year, for the first time since its posting in 2004, and the latter account was blocked in December of last year. The explanations offered by Lycos for the blockage of the two accounts make clear that members of an international pedophile and prostitution ring trafficking in women and children influenced Lycos to get the accounts blocked.
Considering the nature and content of the websites and the timing of their blockage by Lycos in the past twelve months, the blockages in January appear to have been calculated rather than accidental.
The most recent response from Lycos, on June 20, signed by Michael Brule, claimed that the blockage of the three website accounts in mid-January was not deliberate but accidental. Mr. Brule maintains that the blockage was not carried out for parties outside the company but caused by erring computers or technicians in the company. (See below.)
In private email messages readers of the websites of concern here have recalled the sudden, first-time blockages between July 2010 and February 2011 of other Lycos Tripod websites that exposed pedophiles, kidnappers and traffickers and identified their victims. They believe that if the blockage of the three website accounts in mid-January was committed by company employees acting on their own rather than for someone outside the company, the employees acted deliberately and with malicious intentions.
There is indeed some indication that there are employees at Lycos with bad intentions.
The current Wikipedia talk page for Lycos includes remarks posted by two Lycos employees, Joe Pranevich and Stavros Macrakis, that are examples of irresponsible behavior and malicious intent. One makes blatantly false statements about Lycos services to the point of obnoxiousness. Both repeatedly tried to delete, hide and minimize complaints from the public about Lycos services and possible Lycos complicity with pedophile rings. Incidentally, these remarks were posted around the time that the three website accounts of concern here were blocked.
These two employees, Pranevich and Macrakis, seem capable of blocking websites that expose pedophiles, kidnappers and traffickers and identify victims solely out of personal social ill-will and malice. There could be other employees with similar perverse obsessions at Lycos. However, it might be worth investigating these two employees to learn if they had any contact with people outside the company about the blocked website accounts before the blockage.
Kindly reconsider the facts, which should be quite clear, and provide the name or names of the person or persons who requested the blockage of the three website accounts listed above.
Without an honest and sincere explanation from Lycos, the police will have to interrogate Lycos employees to learn the identity/identities of the person/persons responsible for the blockage and their motives.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am,
Jameson Rosemont
------------ FW: Blocked Website
To: public.relations@lycos-inc.com
Thailand July 1, 2011
To the P. R. office, Lycos Tripod
Sir,
A kidnapping and trafficking victim has not been found and is feared dead.
Lycos Tripod employees should cooperate and identify the person or persons who requested the blockage of three relevant website accounts in January so that police may question them to try to determine the fate the victim.
The website accounts concerned are:
Thanomjit Chokjanphen's Website (www.thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/),
Searching for Chanyut Chokjanphen (www.chanyut_1.tripod.com/) and
Chanyut Chokjanphen (www.members.tripod.com/chanyut_1/)
The three website accounts control more than 50 websites posted since 2004 on Lycos to assist law enforcement services world-wide in the search for the victim.
The three website accounts had not been blocked before.
Initially, Lycos offered conflicting excuses for the blockage:
6 Message by our staff on Tue, 8th Feb 2011 12:52 pm
Hello Thanomjit Chokjanphen,
Thank you for your patience.
A staff member has replied to your question:
We understand your situation and we would like to reinstate your site.
However, posting anyones full name, email, and/ or address is not permitted with our services. As long as you are willing to comply to this please let us know and once you have made the changes we can review your site accordingly and take the proper steps to ensure you have followed our Terms of Services.
Please contact us if you need any further assistance with your membership.
Stephan Lycos Customer Service
The remark by the same employee, made when restoring the sites, follows:
13 Message by our staff on Fri, 25th Feb 2011 4:27 pm
Thank you for your patience.
Your site has been reinstated because of Free Speech.
However, if we recieve a subpoena, search warrant, or parallel legal documentation we will have no choice but to shut it down.
You are well in your rights to have the site up and we apologize for any inconvenience.
Please contact us if you need any further assistance.
Stephan Lycos Customer Service
The excuse offered by Steve Osemwenkhae, on June 10, conflicts with the earlier excuses:
6/10/2011 Reply
Steve Osemwenkhae Steve Osemwenkhaesteve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com
To Thanomjit Chokjanphen From: Steve Osemwenkhae (steve.osemwenkhae@lycos-inc.com) Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:59:20 PM To: Thanomjit Chokjanphen (thanomjitchokjanphen@hotmail.com)
Good Morning
The sites were blocked due to a misunderstanding in procedures and a few glitches in our system also took some sites offline. Unfortunately we cannot list out individuals names but I will take responsibility for the matter. We can assure you their was no intent of blocking deliberately. We apologize greatly again for any inconvenience.
The excuses offered by Lycos employees concerning the blockage of the websites, on February 8 and June 10, contradicted one another.
Note also that Mr. Osemwenkhae's comment reads like double-talk: one, he claims the blockage was caused by "a few glitches" and, two, he adds that "we cannot list out individuals names".
The intentions behind these excuses seemed to be to cover up the identity of the person or persons, inside or outside the company, responsible for the blockage of the accounts.
Consider two other Lycos website accounts, belonging to Lawrence Blackstone, Diplomats in Pedophile Scandal, and John Thomas, Organized Crime, the Justice System and the Privy Council of Thailand, which control websites that refer to the victim of concern here without mentioning him by name. The former account was blocked by Lycos in July of last year, for the first time since its posting in 2004, and the latter account was blocked in December of last year. The explanations offered by Lycos for the blockage of the two accounts make clear that members of an international pedophile and prostitution ring trafficking in women and children influenced Lycos to get the accounts blocked.
Considering the nature and content of the websites and the timing of their blockage by Lycos in the past twelve months, the blockages in January appear to have been calculated rather than accidental.
The most recent response from Lycos, on June 20, signed by Michael Brule, claimed that the blockage of the three website accounts in mid-January was not deliberate but accidental. Mr. Brule maintains that the blockage was not carried out for parties outside the company but caused by erring computers or technicians in the company. (See below.)
In private email messages readers of the websites of concern here have recalled the sudden, first-time blockages between July 2010 and February 2011 of other Lycos Tripod websites that exposed pedophiles, kidnappers and traffickers and identified their victims. They believe that if the blockage of the three website accounts in mid-January was committed by company employees acting on their own rather than for someone outside the company, the employees acted deliberately and with malicious intentions.
There is indeed some indication that there are employees at Lycos with bad intentions.
The current Wikipedia talk page for Lycos includes remarks posted by two Lycos employees, Joe Pranevich and Stavros Macrakis, that are examples of irresponsible behavior and malicious intent. One makes blatantly false statements about Lycos services to the point of obnoxiousness. Both repeatedly tried to delete, hide and minimize complaints from the public about Lycos services and possible Lycos complicity with pedophile rings. Incidentally, these remarks were posted around the time that the three website accounts of concern here were blocked.
These two employees, Pranevich and Macrakis, seem capable of blocking websites that expose pedophiles, kidnappers and traffickers and identify victims solely out of personal social ill-will and malice. There could be other employees with similar perverse obsessions at Lycos. However, it might be worth investigating these two employees to learn if they had any contact with people outside the company about the blocked website accounts before the blockage.
Kindly reconsider the facts, which should be quite clear, and provide the name or names of the person or persons who requested the blockage of the three website accounts listed above.
Without an honest and sincere explanation from Lycos, the police will have to interrogate Lycos employees to learn the identity/identities of the person/persons responsible for the blockage and their motives.
On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am,
Jameson Rosemont
---------------------
END OF CORRESPONDENCE
---------------
Note:
The above correspondence was posted on a website controlled by James Champa in mid-2011.
This website account was blocked on or about October 13, 2013. No explanation has yet been given by Lycos Tripod
employees for the blockage. There was instead one hate mail, sent twuce, from one employee, Steve Osemwenkhae, with lewd
insults, in late October and early November 2013.
The company has not answered inquiries about the hate mail.
Comments about the blockage and the hate mail were posted on the Wikipedia Talk pages of Lycos, Tripod and Ybrant Digital
and hacked by Stavros Macrakis and associates in December 2013 and January 2014.
Look at the last two paragraphs of the letter of Jameson Rosemont on July 1, 2011 to the Lycos Tripod Public Relations
email address. The letter refers to the various contraditory explanations offered by different employees for
the blockage of Thanomjit Chokjanphen's website in January 2011.
Look at the fourth and fifth last paragraphs of the letter.
On the James Champa website the two paragraphs appeared as follows:
The current xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx that are examples of irresponsible behavior and malicious intent. One makes blatantly false statements about xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to the point of obnoxiousness. xxxxxxxxx repeatedly tried to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Lycos services and possible Lycos complicity with pedophile rings. Incidentally, these remarks were posted around the time that the three website accounts of concern here were blocked. These xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx seem capable of blocking websites that expose pedophiles, kidnappers and traffickers and identify victims solely out of personal social ill-will and malice. There could be other employees with similar perverse obsessions at Lycos. However, it might be worth investigating these xxxxxxxxxxxx employees to learn if they had any contact with people outside the company about the blocked website accounts before the blockage.
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
